In this talk, Dr. Ronit Levine-Schnur considers whether Bedouin communities presenting their claims within the framework of consultation mechanisms act in accordance with the purpose of the process as defined by the state, or do they insist on bringing forth their collective historical narrative. To test this question, an algorithmic and statistical model that allowed to “listen from afar” to a large corpus of testimonies delivered before inquiry commissions was developed.
The use of advanced computational analysis techniques of topic modelling allowed the identification of the themes and topics that are raised by the Bedouin Indigenous minority before two Israeli state commissions that operated in parallel in 2008, in relation to the ongoing land dispute between the Bedouin society and the State of Israel. Estimating a multiple logistic regression model, we find that Bedouin speakers use the limited speaking time they have before the commissions to voice a theme concerning their communal land possession, reflecting the historical narrative of Bedouin communities.
The study, which will be the topic of this session, reveals that Bedouin speakers act in a sophisticated manner that negotiates their collective history storytelling with future-oriented demands. When not prevented from doing so, the minority group shapes the consultation procedures to include a discussion of the past, while also negotiating necessary adjustments to meet the process’ purpose as set out by the government. The research, thus, sheds light on how consultations are being designed by Indigenous communities from below, with the consequent normative implications for the development of consultation procedures in future cases.